Ваш браузер устарел.

Для того, чтобы использовать все возможности сайта, загрузите и установите один из этих браузеров.

скрыть

Article

  • Title

    Computer modeling of implant for femur reinforcement

  • Authors

    Savielieva О. В.
    Prokopovich Igor V.
    Pavlishko А. V.
    Starushkevych Т.
    Matveev A.

  • Subject

    COMPUTER AND INFORMATION NETWORKS AND SYSTEMS. MANUFACTURING AUTOMATION

  • Year 2018
    Issue 1(54)
    UDC 004.94 : 617.581
    DOI 10.15276/opu.1.54.2018.07
    Pages 51-61
  • Abstract

    The decision of the problem of three-dimensional modeling according to the developed drawings of experimental implants for the reinforcement of femoral bones with the possibility of variation of their parameters according to individual anthropometric features of each patient is proposed. Three-dimensional models of the implant were constructed using a 3D scan of the femur. The calculation of the strength of the implant under the influence of human weight, using the programs Autodesk 3DsMax 2015 and Inventor was carried out. Three-dimensional implant models enable medical professionals to adjust all the required dimensions of the item to the individual anthropometric features of each patient. The construction of the model gives a clear idea of how the implant will look, taking into account those or other parameters. Three-dimensional modeling can provide useful information on the behavior of the implant and the interacting structures of the body in the “unusual” situations caused by the load and deformation leading to a fracture. This information allows us to formulate an additional medical “technical” justification for the correct choice and accurate installation of the implant.

  • Keywords 3D-modeling, proximal femur, preventive reinforcement, implants, strength analysis, calculation of loads
  • Viewed: 170 Dowloaded: 5
  • Download Article
  • References

    Література

     

    1. Поворознюк В.В. Остеопороз – проблема XXI сторіччя. Мистецтво лікування. 2005. № 10. С. 16–20.

    2. Kanis J.A., Burlet N., Cooper C. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos International. 2008. № 19. P. 399–428.

    3. Тонконогий В.М., Савельева Е.В., Бец А.В. Информационные технологии проектирования в ортопеди. Інформаційні технології в освіті, науці та виробництві. Збірник наукових праць. Одеса, 2012. Вип. 1(2). С.182–188.

    4. Кучер Н.К., Земцов М.П., Заразовский М.Н. Деформирование слоистых эпоксидных композитов, армированных высокопрочными волокнами. Проблемы прочности. Киев, 2006. №1(379). С. 41–57.

    5. Лазарев І.А., Гук Ю.М., Олійник Ю.В., Скибан М.В. Напружено – деформований стан проксимального вiддiлу стегновоi кiсткi з наявнiстю порожнистого дефекту осередок фiброзноi дисплазii в умовах остеосинтезу рiзними типами фiксаторiв. Травма. 2015. Т 16, №3. С. 62–70.

    6. Modular femoral tapered revision stems in total hip arthroplasty / Benjamin M. Frye, Keith R. Berend, Michael J. Morris, Joanne B. Adams, Adolph V. Lombardi Jr. Joint Implant Surgery & Research Foundation Chagrin Falls, Ohio, USA. 2017. P. 32–37. URL: http:// healthdocbox.com /Orthopedics/ 72804555-Modular-femoral-tapered-revision-stems-in-total-hip-arthroplasty.html (Last accessed 17.01.2018)

    7. Dimitrienko Yu.I. Modelling of Mechanical Properties of Composite of 3D orthogonal woven composites. Composites Science and Technology. 2011. 162, Vol. 71, P. 1777–1788.

    8. Лайуни Р.К вопросу о механических свойствах костной ткани. Физическое воспитание студентов творческих спеціальностей. Харьков, 2002. Т. 4. С. 18–22.

    9. Дзерович Н.І. Остеопороз: Епідеміологія, медико-соціальне значення, діагностика. Проблеми остеології. 2007. Том 10, № 3–4. C. 16–24.

    10. Поворознюк В.В. Захворювання кістково-м'язової системи в людей різного віку : у 3 т. Київ : Експрес, 2009. Т. 1. 480 с.

    11. Faucett S., Genuario J., Tosteson A., Koval K. Is Prophylactic Fixation a Cost-Effective Method to Prevent a Future Contralateral Fragility Hip Fracture. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma: February 2010. Vol. 24, Issue 2, 65–74.

    12. Surgery for pathological proximal femoral fractures, excluding femoral head and neck fractures / M. Zacherl, G. Gruber, M. Glehr et al. Resection vs. Stabilization. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University Graz, Austria. (SICOT). 2011. 35. 1537–1543.

    13. Lombardi A.V. Jr, Berend K.R., Mallory T.H., Adams J.B. Modular calcar replacement prosthesis with strengthened taper junction in total hip arthroplasty. Surg Technol International. 2007. 16. 206–209.

    14. Лазарев А.Ф., Солод Э.И. Оперативное лечение переломов проксимального отдела бедренной кости. Актуальные вопросы травматологии и ортопедии : материалы VIII съезда травматологов-ортопедов Узбекистана. Ташкент (Узбекистан), 2012. С. 153–154.

    15. Revision total hip arthroplasty with a modular tapered stem / D. Lakstein, Y. Kosashvili, D. Backstein et al. HIP Internationa. (2010) 20(2). 136–142.

    16. Особенности биомеханики проксимального отдела бедра в условиях экспериментального армирования и возникновения низкоэнергетических переломов у лиц старшего возраста / А.Л. Матвеев, В.Э. Дубров, Т.Б. Минасов и др. Травматология, ортопедия и восстановительная медицина третьего тысячелетия : труды первого конгресса стран Шанхайской организации сотрудничества. Маньчжурия, 2013. С. 67–69.

    17. Травматологія та ортопедія : підручник для студ. вищих мед. навч. закладів / за ред. Г.Г. Голки, О.А. Бурянова, В.Г. Климовицького. Вінниця : Нова Книга, 2013. 400 с.

    18. VRML Models from The Titanium Bone Project. Texas: University of Texas at Austin. 2014. URL https://webspace.utexas.edu/reyesr/titanium/3D_models.html (Last accessed 22.01.2018).

    19. Нехожин А.В. Двухслойная математическая модель шейки бедра человека для исследования напряжённого состояния при армировании имплантатами различной конструкции. Вестник Сам. гос. техн. ун-та. Серия Физ.-мат. Науки. 2013. №3(32). С. 129–135.

    20. Оперативный способ профилактики переломов шейки бедренной кости: пат. 2316280 Рос. Федерация: МПК 7 A61B 17/56. № 2006114271/14; заявл. 26.04.06; опубл. 10.02.08, Бюл. № 4. 4 с.

    21. Устройство для армирования кости и профилактики переломов ее при остеопорозе: пат. 121725 Рос. Федерация: МПК7 A61B 17/56. № 2012113218/14; заявл. 04.04.12; опубл. 10.11.12, Бюл. № 31. 5 с.

    22. Оригинальная хирургическая концепция профилактики патологических переломов проксимального отдела бедренной кости при остеопорозе. Экспериментальное исследование / А.Л. Матвеев, В.Э. Дубров, Т.Б. Минасов и др. Проблема остеопороза в травматологии и ортопедии: сборник тезисов. / редкол.: С.С. Родионова [и др.]; Научно-клинический центр остеопороза НМИЦ ТО им. Н. Н. Приорова. Воронеж : Издательско-полиграфический центр Научная книга, 2018. С. 128–130.

    23. Randy Shih. Parametric Modeling with Autodesk Inventor 2017. Oregon Institute of Tehnology, USA, SDC Publications, 2016. 594 p.

    References

    1. Povoroznyuk V.V. (2005). Osteoporosis – The Problem of the XXI Century. The Art of Treatment, 10, 16–20.

    2. Kanis J.A., Burlet N., & Coope, C. (2008). European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos International, 19, 399–428.

    3. Tonkonogiy V. M., Savelieva E.V., & Bets A.V. (2012). Information technologies engineering in orthopedics. Information technology in education, science and production. Collection of scientific works, 1, 2, 182–188.

    4. Kucher N.K., Zemtsov M. P., & Zarazovsky M. N. (2006). Deformation of layered epoxy composites reinforced with high-strength fibers. Problems of Strength, 1, 379, 41–57

    5. Lazarev I.A., Guk Yu.M., Oliynyk Yu.V., Skiban M.V. (2015). Stress-strain state of proximal branch of the femoral ring with the hollow defect of the cell of the fibrous dysplasia under conditions of osteosynthesis by different types of fiksators. Trauma, 16, 3, 62–70.

    6. Benjamin M. Frye, Keith R. Berend, Michael J. Morris, Joanne B. Adams, & Adolph V. Lombardi Jr (2017). Modular femoral tapered revision stems in total hip arthroplasty. Joint Implant Surgery & Research Foundation Chagrin Falls, Ohio, USA. Retrieved from http://healthdocbox.com/Orthopedics/ 72804555- Modular-femoral-tapered-revision-stems-in-total-hip-arthroplasty.html.

    7. Dimitrienko Yu.I. (2011) Modelling of Mechanical Properties of Composite of 3D orthogonal woven composites. Composites Science and Technology, 162, 71, 1777–1788.

    8. Layouny R. (2002). On the question of the mechanical bone tissue’s properties. Physical education of students of creative specialties, 4, 18–22.

    9. Dzerovich N.I. (2007). Osteoporosis: Epidemiology, medical and social significance, diagnostics. Problems of osteology, 10, 3–4, 16–24.

    10. Povoroznyuk V.V. (2009). Diseases of the musculoskeletal system of all ages people (Vol. 1). Kyiv: Express.

    11. Faucett Scott; Genuario James; Tosteson Anna; & Koval, Kenneth (2010). Is Prophylactic Fixation a Cost-Effective Method to Prevent a Future Contralateral Fragility Hip Fracture. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma: February 2010, 24, 2, 65–74.

    12. Zacherl M., Gruber G., Glehr M., & Ofner P., et al. (2011). Surgery for pathological proximal femoral fractures, excluding femoral head and neck fractures. Resection vs. Stabilization. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical University Graz, Austria. (SICOT), 35, 1537–1543.

    13. Lombardi A.V. Jr., Berend K.R., Mallory T.H., & Adams J.B. (2007). Modular calcar replacement prosthesis with strengthened taper junction in total hip arthroplasty. Surg Technol International, 16, 206–209.

    14. Lazarev A.F., & Malt E.I. (2012). Operative treatment of the proximal femur fractures. Actual Questions of Traumatology and Orthopedics: Materials of the VIII Congress of TraumatologistsOrthopedists of Uzbekistan. Tashkent (Uzbekistan), 153–154.

    15. Lakstein D., Kosashvili Y., Backstein D., Safir O., Lee P., & Gross A.E. (2010) Revision total hip arthroplasty with a modular tapered stem. HIP International, 20(2), 136–142.

    16. Matveev A.L., Dubrov V.E., Minasov Т.B., & Nechihin A.V. et al. (2013). Biomechanics features of the proximal femur in conditions of experimental reinforcement and the low-energy fractures appearance of old people. The first congress proceedings of the countries of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Traumatology, orthopedics and restorative medicine of the third millennium. Manchuria, 67–69.

    17. Golky G.G., Buryanov O.A., & Klimovitsky V.G. (Eds.). (2013). Traumatology and orthopedics: book for stud. Higher Honey tutor establishments. Vinnitsa: The New Book.

    18. VRML Models from The Titanium Bone Project. (2014). Texas: University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved from https://webspace.utexas.edu/reyesr/titanium/3D_models.html.

    19. Nekhozhin A.V. (2013). Bilayer mathematical model of human femur neck for the stress state research after reinforcement with different designs of implants. Herald of the Samara State Technical University. Series: Physico-mathematical sciences, 32, 129–135.

    20. Matveev A.L. (2006). Operative way of femoral neck fractures prevention. Russian Federation Patent: RU 2316280.

    21. Matveev A.L., Nekhozhin A.V., Minasov T.B., & Frolov A.V. Bone reinforcement device and prevention of fractures in osteoporosis. Russian Federation Patent: RU 121725

    22. Matveev A.L., Dubrov V.E., Minasov Т.B., Matveeva I.I., Savelieva E.V., & Nekhozhin A.V. (2018). The original surgical concept of preventing the proximal femur’s pathological fractures in osteoporosis. Experimental research. The problem of osteoporosis in traumatology and orthopedics: a collection of abstracts. S.S. Rodionova et al. (Ed.) Scientific and clinical center of osteoporosis NMITS TO. N. N. Priorova. Voronezh: Publishing and Polygraphic, Center Scientific Book, 128–130.

    23. Randy Shih. (2016). Parametric Modeling with Autodesk Inventor 2017. Oregon Institute of Tehnology, USA, SDC Publications.

  • Creative Commons License by Author(s)